Respiratory Care Practitioner

The respiratory care practitioner (RCP) is the frontline specialist who is key to cardiopulmonary support for premature infants to critically ill patients. RCPs also operate complex life-support devices, diagnose acute and chronic respiratory conditions, and administer specialized, life-saving treatments in high-stakes settings, such as the intensive care unit and the emergency room.

This highly specialized profession demands rigorous training, and an RCP’s professional license is their most valuable asset, as patient safety depends on it. This is so, given their responsibility to prioritize patient safety and uphold the highest clinical standards.

With this high pressure and scrutiny on the profession, every licensing complaint has the potential to jeopardize your career. Do not face the board alone. Contact the San Francisco license attorney immediately.

Roles of the Respiratory Care Practitioner

In California, the role of a respiratory care practitioner (RCP) is governed by strict professional boundaries outlined in law to ensure the safety and well-being of the population.

The practice of respiratory care is a healthcare profession, as defined in California Business and Professions Code (BPC) Section 3702. All RCPs work under the supervision of a medical director. Its scope encompasses the therapy, management, rehabilitation, diagnostic evaluation, and care of patients with pulmonary and cardiopulmonary conditions and disorders, as well as the assessment and treatment of cardiopulmonary functions.

This legal definition encompasses a wide range of duties, including:

  • Administering pharmacological agents
  • Administering therapeutic gases
  • Monitoring patient reactions
  • Implementing therapy plans

The specific definitions within BPC 3702 are vital. It sets the exact guidelines for professional behavior, by which the Respiratory Care Board evaluates licensees. Any malpractice that involves not adhering to these set obligations, for example, the scope of practice or acting in a grossly negligent manner in respect to the application of the practice, constitutes a statutory breach. It then forms the basis for disciplinary action and subsequent licensure defense.

Because of the sensitive nature of the work of the RCP, the state pays much attention to the RCP’s integrity. RCPs can also work in high-acuity settings, like Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), a task that involves caring for the most critically ill patients. This essential role fosters a significant degree of public trust, which necessitates the strict adherence to the standard of social protection, commonly referred to as public protection.

Moreover, the Code not only establishes the nature of an RCP but also specifies the standard of professional ethics and legal practice needed to ensure patient safety and professional licensure.

The Respiratory Care Board (RCB) Complaint Process

According to Business and Professions Code Section 3710.1, the Respiratory Care Board (RCB) of California has a primary mandate to safeguard the public, not the licensed respiratory care practitioner. This regulatory mandate involves enforcing the Respiratory Care Practice Act and its regulations to promote the safe and competent practice of respiratory care in the state. The RCB is primarily concerned with protecting consumers. Therefore, enforcement is a significant concern in ensuring the integrity of the profession.

Complaints may arise from several sources that initiate the enforcement process, and these sources have their basis. The most common source of complaints is the consumer (patients or their families), who may file a report based on the quality of care, negligence, or ethical misconduct.

Nevertheless, there are also complaints about mandatory reporting. This means that employers must report any leave, resignation, suspension, or termination for cause of an RCP on grounds of cause (drug or alcohol impairment, patient harm, or gross incompetence). Furthermore, the RCB is notified by the Department of Justice (DOJ) of criminal convictions or fingerprint notifications that may potentially impact the safety of a licensee in practice.

The RCB has a step-by-step investigation after a complaint has been submitted. The initial step is a desk investigation, initially carried out by board staff, aimed at reviewing the jurisdiction of the allegation that could be part of a complaint and whether the complaint has merit. If the staff has a valid reason, the case is referred to the Division of Investigation (DOI) within the Department of Consumer Affairs. This is followed by a DOI field investigation. It is during this investigation that professional investigators (often former law enforcement personnel) interview witnesses, collect evidence, and seek the expert opinion of RCP consultants.

When the investigation has proven that a violation of the Practice Act occurred, the case is officially referred to the Office of the Attorney General (AG). An accusation, a formal charging document, is then drafted by the AG, and it triggers an administrative court process. This could result in a reprimand, probation, suspension, or loss of the RCP’s license.

Actions That Trigger Board Discipline

The RCB may take disciplinary action when an RCP engages in conduct demonstrating unfitness to practice or against the Respiratory Care Practice Act. These transgressions can be grouped into three main groups:

  1. Criminal Convictions

The conviction of a crime is a cause of discipline, mainly where the crime is found to be substantially related to the qualification, functions, or duties of an RCP. These offenses include:

  • Driving under the influence (DUI) — DUIs are one of the most widespread criminal charges, which lead to the loss of a license, as it is directly connected to substance abuse. It also shows a lack of concern for the safety of others.
  • Substantially related crimes — It is a category of crimes that are related to fraud, fiscal misconduct, theft, harassment, sexual misconduct, and neglect or abuse of a dependent adult or minor. The RCB evaluates these crimes to determine whether the license holder is presently or likely to be unfit to perform their professional duties.
  1. Practice Violations (Negligence and Incompetence)

All the following actions are directly associated with the provision of respiratory care services and patient safety:

  • Gross negligence or incompetence — Committing actions of respiratory care that are less than the recommended standard of care, resulting in patient injury or possible injury
  • Falsifying records — Entails entering any patient chart or other healthcare record, as well as billing fraud, in a grossly incorrect or fraudulent manner
  • Changing physician orders — This refers to modifying a physician’s prescription or treatment plan without their authorization.
  1. Lack of professionalism and Reporting Abnormalities

This area encompasses malpractice, drug-related issues, and failure to comply with required standards.

  • Substance abuse —  Abuse of alcohol or controlled substances that exposes the licensee or the public to harm, especially when the licensee is on duty. These violations are often monitored, randomly tested, and referred to rehabilitative programs by the RCB.
  • Sexual misconduct — Engaging in any sexual contact or relationship with a patient.
  • Failure to report — Failing to report a criminal conviction or disciplinary action imposed upon a person by another licensing entity within the period of time so required is, in itself, a breach of the Practice Act.
  • Failure to comply with probation — A condition or term violation by the board, which has been determined after a disciplinary action.

Aggravating Factors in RCB Disciplinary Actions

In determining the final punishment, the Respiratory Care Board considers aggravating factors, which indicate why the public should be subjected to a more severe punishment. These considerations are highly detrimental to the RCP. They may lead to the harshest punishment (license revocation), even though the first offense may have otherwise been treated with probation. Recognizing these risks is crucial to any RCP under investigation or facing administrative legal action.

The RCB has aggravating factors that are the most common and serious, including:

  • Prior disciplinary history — This refers to any prior adverse action, regardless of its severity, like a public reprimand or a stayed revocation. This indicates a pattern of risk and suggests that prior corrective action was ineffective. This is one of the primary reasons for intensifying sanctions.
  • Actual patient harm — If an actual injury, lasting impairment, or death is caused to a patient due to the incompetence of the RCP, for example, gross negligence or substance impairment during duty, the disciplinary measure will invariably be a suspension or revocation.
  • Intentional misconduct — An intentional, willful wrongdoing, like fraud, premeditated billing fraud, and sexual misconduct, is regarded as being much more heinous than an error committed due to mere negligence or incompetence.
  • Absence of cooperation or remorse — There are instances of not fully cooperating with the investigation conducted by the board, any attempt to conceal misconduct, or demonstrating indifference toward accountability. The board could interpret these as a sign of a lack of accountability and rehabilitative potential. A more severe penalty could be imposed.

Potential Board Resolutions (Outcomes)

In the event of a case against an RCP that the Attorney General has successfully prosecuted, the Respiratory Care Board (RCB) refers to the published Disciplinary Guidelines and Model Orders to determine the penalty. The administrative legal procedure, typically settled using a stipulated settlement agreement, has the following primary outcomes, which are the least to the most serious:

  • Public reprimand — This is a formal, public disciplinary action. While it is less severe than a suspension, it remains a permanent part of the practitioner’s public record and can affect future employment opportunities.
  • Probation — This is a harsh punishment that takes three to five years, and it allows you to practice, but within very strict, specified terms. You will have a probation supervisor and will be subject to a rigorous monitoring program designed to ensure your safety and well-being. The main requirements may consist of:
  1. Strict compliance — You are required to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and comply with all RCB regulations. You must report in writing to the board within 48 to 72 hours of any event that has led to an arrest or a citation.
  2. Monitoring and reporting — You will be required to file comprehensive quarterly reports, under penalty of perjury, at the beginning of every fourth week in January, April, July, and October. You should also provide the board with specific contact details of all your employers and supervisors, and obtain written permission from them and the monitor to contact the RCB regarding your status.
  3. Worksite monitor — If necessary, you should suggest a board-qualified worksite monitor who shall not be a relation of any kind or have a financial relationship with you. This monitor will be in physical contact with you (usually during weekly conferences). They shall provide monthly reports to the board on your attendance, behavior, and any indications of possible misconduct or impairment.
  4. Substance monitoring — When it comes to substance abuse, you will be regularly and randomly tested. You must entirely stop taking alcohol and controlled substances. You can also be forced to take psychological or physical tests and be forced to take rehabilitation or counseling sessions that are compulsory.
  5. Cost recovery — You are liable to pay the cost recovery fees of the board that compensates the RCB for the expenses of the investigation and the monthly monitoring program. Failure to meet these costs or violating any of the probation conditions may result in immediate suspension or revocation of probation.
  • Suspension — Temporary proscription to practice as an RCP, either for a specified or for an indefinite duration. As a final disciplinary order or before a necessary physical or mental examination, suspensions can be imposed.
  • Revocation — This is the irrevocable suspension of the license to practice respiratory care in California. This is the most significant punishment. Nevertheless, a licensee can also request reinstatement of their license by the RCB, provided they have had at least three years since the date of revocation, as long as they can provide evidence of extensive rehabilitation.
  • Stipulated surrender of license — When a licensee voluntarily surrenders their license, it is known as a stipulated surrender of license. For disciplinary and public record purposes, a surrender is typically regarded as a revocation of the license. You will have lost the opportunity to practice and must wait for at least three years before applying to the board to be reinstated.

Find a Respiratory Care Practitioner License Defense Attorney Near Me

RCPs are indispensable frontline professionals responsible for managing life-threatening cardiopulmonary conditions. They offer necessary care, which includes neonatal intensive care to chronic disease management. Their expertise in diagnostics, life support, and patient instruction is the air of life to numerous people. If accusations ever threaten your RCP professional license, protect your livelihood. Contact the San Francisco License Attorney at (415) 707-6383 today to protect your professional license and secure your future.

star
star

I was facing serious charges that could have cost me my license. San Francisco License Attorney provided expert guidance and defense that ultimately saved my career.

Lily M.

star
star

The team at San Francisco License Attorney truly cares about their clients. They fought for me every step of the way and helped me retain my professional license.

James K.

star
star

Professional, reliable, and knowledgeable. San Francisco License Attorney handled my case with the utmost care, and I couldn’t be more satisfied with the outcome.

Tina R.

star
star

I can’t thank San Francisco License Attorney enough for their support. They took my case seriously, answered all my questions, and made sure I kept my license.

Eric B.

star
star

I was so stressed about losing my license, but San Francisco License Attorney’s team gave me hope and delivered outstanding results. Highly recommended!

Catherine D.

Most license discipline issues in California are determined through a formal hearing process according to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). This law provides for basic due process through a hearing and written notices. This often happens if demanded by the person denied a license or the licensee before an administrative law judge. It usually takes place at the office of the Administrative Hearings. Some administrative issues are addressed informally through other procedures, like an informal citation or investigation.

Unlike other forms of trials, in a formal administrative disciplinary hearing, the bureau, board, or licensing agency makes the final ruling on the case. The department, bureau, board, or licensing agency can reverse the ruling of the administrative judge even if the judge finds in a licensee’s favor.

Most attorneys have licenses, but only a few have the competency to handle professional licensing administrative cases. An attorney must frequently attend the administrative hearings to be competent to handle licensing administrative cases. He/she must also have handled several professional licensing issues.

Professional licensing administrative cases can take many years from the initial incident to a final ruling. Only a competent attorney has the knowledge of the process. An attorney who does not attend administrative hearings or appeals of adverse rulings might not have the confidence, insight, or ability to deliver on a case.

There are provisions for license reinstatement. You can restore your revoked license upon showing rehabilitation. A defendant is required to wait for a period that does not exceed three years to file a petition for reinstatement. You will not have to requalify for the license. You only need to attend an administrative hearing or appear before a licensing board at a board meeting to ask for reinstatement. Other licensing agencies can ask you to reapply for the license.

The license applicant can request the agency to look into its ruling before the ruling becomes final. Reconsideration is often a chance to review the weakness in the administrative ruling. This allows new evidence and legal arguments to draw the licensing agency’s attention. It also gives an opportunity for objections before the administrative case ends. Sometimes, the agency can stay or delay the ruling for a short period to review the petition for reconsideration. The agency can request written or verbal arguments if reconsideration is granted. This can happen before a new ruling is issued, either changing or affirming the prior ruling.

Some license denials or formal punishments result in a stipulated settlement that can inform a plea bargain. The licensing agency will drop severe disciplinary action or outright denial of a license in a stipulated settlement. This can help achieve a faster resolution of the case. The license applicant is also allowed to waive their right to a hearing to avoid potentially more severe punishment or an outright license denial after the hearing. Stipulated settlements often result from negotiation between the defendant’s attorney and the agency’s attorney.

The terms of a stipulated settlement vary depending on the agency, department, bureau, or board. Certain cases can be settled for a reprimand, but many cases are settled for probation. Often, probation involves some suspended or stayed punishment and specific duties, like treatment, community service, or classes. You risk facing a previous suspension or stay of punishment if you commit a new violation during the probationary period.

A formal administrative hearing is more of a trial. It is presided over by a judge, a court reporter, and attorneys who present the cases. A highly trained attorney represents the state agency. He/she will handle licensing issues professionally throughout the whole process. The environment is usually less formal than the superior court because a jury is not allowed. The rules of evidence, which strictly apply in civil and criminal cases, are not as strict. The following will happen during an administrative hearing:

  • The evidence will be tabled.
  • The witnesses are cross-examined and asked questions
  • Making of closing factual and legal arguments

You will receive a flat fee or an hourly fee when you consult the San Francisco Licensing Attorney. We accept many forms of payment. This includes checks, cash, debit cards, and credit cards. We can bill your insurance company directly for your legal fees if you have license defense coverage on your errors and omissions insurance policy. Our company will do this if your carrier extends coverage to your licensing case. We will also ask your insurance company to reimburse you for your legal fees at the end of your case.

Most appeals of administrative rulings are made in the Superior Court. Also known as an appeal for writ of administrative mandamus, this process is extremely complicated. The Superior Court will demand written legal arguments and preparation of the administrative hearing record. The court will set a hearing after the written argument process. In most cases, the case will be sent back to the administrative agency with guidance from the Superior Court if the defendant wins the appeal.

Like in most criminal cases, a person denied a license or a licensee has a right to testify during the hearing, unless the Fifth Amendment rights are invoked. The licensing agency attorney will call you to serve as a witness if you fail to voluntarily testify on your own behalf. You should have a skilled license law attorney to prepare you for the hearing if you have an administrative hearing. Our San Francisco License Attorney team will take you through the questions during testimony. We will also protect you from improper or unfair questions from the prosecutor.

Find A Dependable License Defense Attorney Near Me